|
The Human
Element
By: Néstor Colombo
We live in a world
today that is significantly smaller than that of generations before
us. The ongoing process of globalization has been characterized by
advanced forms of communication, greater access to information, and
ease of travel. No doubt, the development of mass media
communications has been and continues to be a central component of
globalization; however the results and effects of this development,
whether positive or negative, are difficult to measure. Although we
boast a wealth of scientific, technological, and communicational
innovation; a generation with an unprecedented potential for
achievement; and governments with concentrated peace-making
processes; we are still witness to (in both the developed and the
developing worlds) social disintegration; growing levels of
societal, political and cultural exclusion; greater ethnic and
religious rivalries; exaggerated expressions of “nationalism”; and
many other forms of intolerance. From this angle, if we examine the
impact of communication technologies on people and cultures living
within complex national and international situations, we can see that
communication presents both limitless opportunities and tremendous
dangers.
Let us consider the
foundation of all communicative processes: verbal communication.
Face-to-face, direct communication has a power without equal. Every
civilization rests on the spoken word. The enormous importance of
the spoken word is obvious in every culture, language, and
socioeconomic stratum. This form of communication implies the
presence of more than one person, because the only way it can be
transmitted and received is through speakers and listeners. Verbal
communication as a means for the exchange of ideas will continue to
hold a central position even in our era of electronic medium.
Statistics reveal that radio is situated as the medium valued above
television and written press as the most effective means of
communication. Radio takes off in its own dimension of “propinquity
to people.” Radio is associated with immediacy, intimacy and the
warmth of a personal encounter; in short, radio has the power of
creating “relationship.” Just consider the popularity of programs
such as “Delilah,” broadcast nationally to an enormous audience.
The written word, on the
other hand, assumes the utter absence of a second party. No one can
read or write in the presence of others without putting himself in
an incommodious or rude situation. Both the written word and the
writer are bound to isolation and personal retreat, that is to say,
situating themselves outside of a “relationship.” The intrinsic
nature of the written word is not found in the
interpersonal. Interestingly enough, audio-visual communication,
namely television, occupies an intermediate position in the
relationship between the spoken and the written words. We know that
television does not demand from us isolation or distance, as does
the written word, neither does it contradict nor challenge the
concept of relationship, and thereby it easily finds a place in our
everyday world. Strangely enough, although we add a dimension of
video, the visual image does not have the same impact as the actual
presence of a person, nor does it hold the intimacy of the spoken
word or the intensity of interpersonal communication.
Christian communications
must be characterized by utmost human responsibility. As
communicators, even though we possess tremendous God-given resources
and a phenomenal vision to reach nations through mass
communications, at times we still manage to lose “touch” with our
own people. In the context of our work environments, companies,
ministries, and organizations, even considering the many effective
means of communication that we have at our disposal, we can still
find ourselves losing grasp of our “relationships.”
There are certain
outstanding characteristics that Christian leaders need possess if
they desire to reach multitudes with the message: the ability to
(1) establish “relationships”, (2) sustain immediacy, (3)
effectively motivate, and (4) genuinely value their own people. I
believe these are necessary conditions for effective team building,
overall growth, and healthy competition. These are, indeed, heart
qualities. Feigned relationships, respect, or appreciation produce
disastrous results, the worst being a boomerang effect where the
leader finds himself on the receiving end of contrived respect and
insincere submission.
Leaders should “enjoy”
their teams, share with them, permit them to grow, grant them the
opportunity to actively participate, and listen to their points of
view. This should especially be the case in small to medium sized
organizations, where the director or owner has the potential to know
each one of his employees by their first name, possibly many of them
having partnered for the cause of the organization over a long
period of time. A leader should take great care in the selection of
his personnel, and then trust them. He should seek out those
employees to whom he can freely delegate. A true leader directs
delegates, empowers, and trusts others will meet the task.
Even though every
tool for communication is immensely useful (memos, e-mail, voice
mail, intranet, audio, video etc.) most people prefer to obtain
information from a human being that manifests trust and openness to
dialog. Personal communication, the spoken word, is always more
powerful. If we make time to communicate and interact with our
team, leaving behind our arrogance and attitudes, we have the
potential to develop a powerful team. Do not forfeit your team. If
you do not cultivate a relationship with them, sooner or later, they
will leave in search of a better work environment. Your staff is
your greatest asset; they add value to your organization. Others
may copy your marketing strategy or your product, but your staff can
never be cloned. Cultivate your relationship with them, and your
organization, vision, and outreach will grow in yet another
dimension.
|